fb_px

Unsolicited Phone Calls Led to Felony Stalking in North Carolina

In this case, the victim, a 75-year-old widow, began receiving repeated, unsolicited phone calls from a fellow church member
November 18, 2024

In North Carolina, repeated, unwanted phone calls can lead to felony stalking charges, especially if they cause the victim significant emotional distress or fear for their safety. A recent case out of Pitt County and heard before Marvin K. Blount, III, Senior Resident Judge, illustrates just how serious unsolicited phone contact can become when it crosses into the realm of harassment. State v. Smith, 904 S.E.2d 434 (N.C. Ct. App. 2024)

In this case, the victim, a 75-year-old widow, began receiving repeated, unsolicited phone calls from a fellow church member, Roger B. Smith. After a single conversation where the victim provided her phone number, Smith began calling her multiple times a day, leaving numerous voicemails and making inappropriate comments, including one where he claimed that “God told him to ask her out and to take care of her ” and clearly thought they should be together. Despite the victim repeatedly telling Smith to stop, the calls continued daily for over six months. She was not interested in a relationship with him and provided him her phone number originally as she thought he had questions about community college classes she was taking.

What made this situation particularly frightening for the victim was the nature and persistence of the calls. Smith’s comments about wanting to have sex with her, coupled with his constant contact, deeply unsettled her. She testified that the harassment caused her such distress that she couldn’t sleep and was too afraid to leave her home. She even had to seek psychiatric help, and her daily life drastically changed—she stopped attending church and school, stayed indoors, and made her home into a fortress by locking herself in by 4 p.m. every day. She put all the food and other necessities she envisioned she would need in the back of her home and never went to the front again after evening commenced.

The court ultimately found Smith guilty of felony stalking because his repeated phone calls, along with his refusal to respect her boundaries, caused significant emotional distress for the victim. Her actions—changing her routine, seeking psychiatric care, and reporting the harassment to both her pastor and the police—demonstrated to the court that she was genuinely terrified for her safety.

The fact that it took months and finally a police visit for him to cease calling her is indication of serious intent. She asked him to stop calling, she rarely to never answered the phone, asked her pastor to speak with him, and sought law enforcement assistance. Yet, he still debated to the court whether or not his behavior, daily and over months, could lead a reasonable person to be afraid or have substantial emotional distress? Honestly, let the crazy roll. Imprisonment is not good enough for Mr. Smith, without significant and long term mental health treatment and monitoring at his own expense. Remember that to have a felony conviction, he had to have a prior stalking conviction, so he did not learn from his first bought of bad behavior.

This case serves as a sobering reminder: unwanted phone calls, especially when persistent and intrusive, can have serious legal consequences, including felony stalking charges. Victims should take action if they feel harassed, as North Carolina law protects against such severe invasions of privacy and emotional security.

One last thought on this case from a legal and moral perspective – nothing in the case raised the issue of mental competence of Roger B. Smith nor did the case note his age. The court (or the defense attorney) may want to check to see if Mr. Smith needs a legal guardian or has some other health concern (dementia or alzheimer disease) which could cause significant behavior modifications or cause him to lack mens rea. If this was a civil case, which the elderly woman is entitled to take out and would likely get damages from Mr. Smith, a motion for a psychological evaluation may occur. Also, please call your elderly family members and check in on them to ensure no one is taking advantage!

Abandonment Addiction alientation Alimony Annesophia Richards Attorney Allie Moore Mediation auto appraisal Avoid Court Costs Bad behavior during divorce proceedings Benefits of Mediation Books Boundaries Breastfeeding business tax returns Cape Fear Family Law Mediation Certified Mediators Child Custody Child Custody Mediation Children Child Support child support modification Communication Community Assistance Conservatorship Conservatyorship Controlled Costs Cost-Effective Mediation Solutions Courtroom Absenteeism Custodial Exchange Custody discovery process Divorce Divorce and Your Business Divorce Arrangements Divorce Law Divorce Mediation Domestic Violence Equitable Distribution family businesses Family Dispute Mediation Family Law Family Law Mediation Faster Resolution Felony Stalking Finance Flexible Costs Foreclosures Government Assistance Grandparent Visitation harassment How Mediation Works in Family Law inappropriate comments litigation long-arm statute Long-Term Savings lower child support payments Lower Legal Fees Low Income Mothers Marital Estate Marital Property Mediation Follow-Up Mediation in Family Law Mediation Process Explained Mediation vs Litigation Medical Mental Health Messy Divorce Minimized Conflict Missed Doctors Appointments North Carolina Other Resources Parent Coordinator Parenting personal jurisdiction Post - Divorce Arrangements Post-separation Debts Private Investigators Property Distribution protective order rampant drug use Separation Separation Agreement skipping court dates Spiritual Assistance Starting Mediation Process Step Children Supervised Visitation Support Groups Unsolicited Phone Calls valuing cars Visitation waving attorney fee

Janet Gemmell
Practicing law for over 20 years may have caused Janet some gray hairs, but she remains young at heart, probably because she loves what she does. Janet's focus is to work with clients building new lives after relationship turmoil and although it is hard work, she finds it utterly rewarding. Such work and experiences gives Janet a ton of insight and along with her legal knowledge (afterall she is a Board Certified Family Law Specialist) she is able to get to the heart of any legal matter quickly in order to start helping clients find resolutions and to get their lives back on track.

Latest Blog Posts

Breaking Down a Messy Divorce – With a Side of Sanctions

When it came time to divvy up the marital estate, the judge made it clear that David’s antics had consequences

Courtroom Absenteeism – Not the Best-Strategy

Fairness is subjective when you’re not even in the courtroom to make your case.

Child Support INCREASED after 2 kids age out – Court of Appeals 2024

With no children born from the marriage but adult kids from previous ones, they quickly found themselves fighting over everything from houses to a boat

Crenshaw Child Support

The plaintiff’s subpoena attempts to delve into family business tax returns were promptly hit with a protective order

The Critical Importance of Discovery in Litigation

When you enter a legal dispute through the court system, both sides have a right to obtain information that supports their

When Is Enough, Enough? The System Failed Baby Ken

Picture this: a newborn, vulnerable and fragile, suffering from a hernia that, without surgery, left him in constant pain

Our Core Values

Knowledgeable

Knowledgeable

We know what to do and we actively share our knowledge.

Integrity

Integrity

Honesty in action and a good moral compass.

Empathetic

Empathetic

Active understanding without judgment.

Accountable

Accountable

To yourself, your clients, your colleagues and the court.