COVID-19’s Impact on Migrant Children

Immigration authorities have increased deportations during the COVID-19 emergency...
June 22, 2020
COVID-19's Impact on Migrant Children

The COVID-19 pandemic is a global issue, unprecedented in contemporary times. While you hear most about its impact on things like education, the economy, and leisure travel, there is one group of people that the Coronavirus has wreaked havoc upon: the hundreds of migrant children and teenagers trying to leave dangerous towns in Mexico and Honduras for the supposed safety of America.

Immigration authorities have increased deportations during the COVID-19 emergency, citing a need to contain the disease and prevent its spread among the American people. However, in doing so, they are circumventing existing laws that allow migrant children to speak to a social worker or plea for asylum from the violence in their home countries.

This represents a major shift in policy. For decades, administrations have provided migrant children with shelter, education, medical care and the ability to make a case for their immigration to the US. Any child who was deported was only done so during daylight hours and after arrangements had been made with a family member in the country they were returning to.

However, since January, President Trump has issued border decrees that have deported children mere hours after they crossed the border and deported children suddenly in the middle of the night, with little warning to their legal representation. This violates the Trafficking Victims Protection Act.

Since 2017, the Trump administration has put forth radical immigration policies, including separating children from parents at the border and refusing to give basic supplies, like toothpaste and soap, to unsupervised migrant children in overcrowded holding cells. Customs and Border Protection have also refused to release how they are applying legal standards to migrant children, and this new deportation policy will remain in place indefinitely, with review every month.

Acting Customs and Border Protection Commissioner Mark Morgan has claimed that this sudden departure from established immigration policy is due to the Coronavirus pandemic. He told reporters that migrant children “pose an absolute, concrete public health risk to this country and everybody they come in contact with.”

Democrats in Congress argue that these actions violate the Trafficking Victims Protection Act, but it has been difficult to prevent further deportations. Claudia Cubas, a lawyer with the Capital Area Immigrants’ Rights Coalition, believes that COVID-19 is not the cause of these deportations, but is the reason they have been allowed to continue. She says, “Our courts are in a state of emergency. Our media is COVID-19 all the time. We don’t even have congressional hearings right now in full force. There is less scrutiny” on unjust deportations.

However, there have been legal accusations that ICE (Immigration and Custom Enforcement) has violated the human rights of detained migrant children. The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) and the Northwest Immigrant Rights Project (NWIRP) are currently involved in lawsuits against ICE, as a result.

Eunice Cho, an attorney at the ACLU, told reporters that “Immigrant detention centers are institutions that uniquely heighten the danger of disease transmission. In normal circumstances, ICE has proven time and again that it is unable to protect the health and safety of detained people. These are not normal circumstances, and the heightened risk of serious harm to people in detention from COVID-19 is clear.” The children in detention are likely not bringing COVID-19 to the US, but their time in ICE facilities is rapidly spreading the disease.

If the ACLU or NWIRP wins their lawsuits, ICE will have to release many of these migrants from their holding centers and allow them to practice social distancing in safe homes. For many of these migrant children, legal actions like this are their only hope at remaining in this country, safe from the gang violence and extreme poverty of their homes.

How to Preserve Digital Evidence So a NC Judge Will Actually Use It

How to Preserve Digital Evidence So a NC Judge Will Actually Use It

North Carolina trial judges are cautious about digital evidence. Screenshots can be fabricated, modified, or taken out of context. To get digital evidence admitted under North Carolina Rule of Evidence 901 (Authentication), you must establish its authenticity, completeness, and chain of custody.

Raw Screenshot vs. Forensic Capture

Steps for Lawful, Admissible Digital Evidence Preservation

  1. Capture Complete Screenshots with Context: Do not crop out battery bars, network indicators, contact names, dates, or timestamps. Capture the full conversation thread leading up to and following the key statement.
  2. Export Native Files and Metadata: Where possible, export thread logs directly to PDF or native format (e.g., .eml files for email, .vcf or full carrier logs for SMS). Ensure EXIF metadata (embedded time, location, and device data) remains intact on digital photos.
  3. Obtain Certified Carrier Records: Request official call detail records and text message transmission logs from cellular service providers via subpoena or formal discovery requests.
  4. Maintain a Detailed Evidence Log: Record the date, time, device used, and method of capture for every piece of digital evidence preserved.

Digital Capture Methods Matrix: Legality & Admissibility in NC

The following matrix summarizes common methods of capturing digital evidence in North Carolina family law proceedings:

Frequently Asked Questions About Digital Evidence in NC Divorce

Is it legal to screenshot my spouse’s texts in NC?

Yes, it is entirely legal to screenshot text messages sent directly to your device or sent within a group thread that includes you. Because you are a party to the communication, you have lawful access to the messages. To ensure admissibility in court, capture complete conversation threads that display the sender’s phone number or contact header, alongside full date and time stamps.

Can I use Life360 data in a NC custody case?

Yes, Life360 or Apple Find My location data can be used in North Carolina custody cases if the account was established mutually and you accessed the location data legally through your own authorized user profile. Location logs can help corroborate or refute claims regarding travel times, missed custody handoffs, or presence at unapproved locations. However, if you secretly log into your spouse’s private account after separation to track them, that data becomes inadmissible and exposes you to legal sanctions.

Is Ring camera footage admissible in NC family court?

Yes, Ring camera and video doorbell footage is routinely admitted in North Carolina family court to document custody exchanges, property damage, or domestic disturbances. Because outdoor entryways and driveways do not carry an expectation of privacy, footage captured by property-mounted cameras is lawful. To introduce Ring footage in trial, you must provide the raw video file, preserve the embedded metadata, and verify the time and date of the recording.

What happens if I put spyware on my spouse’s phone in NC?

Installing spyware, keyloggers, or hidden tracking software on a spouse’s phone is a crime in North Carolina under the NC Wiretap Act (N.C.G.S. § 15A-287) and Computer Trespass laws (N.C.G.S. § 14-458), as well as federal wiretap statutes. Any evidence obtained through spyware is strictly inadmissible in family court. Furthermore, the spouse who installed the spyware faces potential felony charges, mandatory payment of opposing attorney fees, and severe loss of credibility with the judge in custody and financial rulings.

How do I prove digital evidence is authentic in a North Carolina court?

Under North Carolina Rule of Evidence 901, you prove digital evidence is authentic by demonstrating that the evidence is what you claim it to be. This requires showing a clear chain of custody, providing unedited files containing native metadata, cross-referencing screenshots with official cellular carrier billing statements, or presenting witness testimony from the individual who captured or received the transmission.

Take Control of Your Digital Strategy Today

Navigating digital evidence in a divorce or custody dispute requires technical precision and experienced legal counsel. One wrong move can turn valuable evidence into a legal liability.

Protect your rights and secure your family’s future with our actionable digital evidence resources:

  • Download the Homewrecker Evidence Guide
  • Learn exactly how to audit your digital privacy, disconnect shared family accounts safely, and archive text messages for your legal team without violating state or federal privacy statutes.

Ready to discuss your case directly with an expert? Schedule a Confidential Consultation with Board-Certified Family Law Specialist Janet L. Gemmell at Cape Fear Family Law Today.

Legal Disclaimer & Ethical Notice

  • No Attorney-Client Relationship: Reading this blog or downloading any related resource does not create an attorney-client relationship. That relationship is formed only when a written engagement agreement is signed by both parties.
  • Information, Not Advice: This content is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Every equitable distribution case is fact-specific, and outcomes depend on the particular assets, debts, marital history, and county involved.
  • No Guarantee of Results: Past case outcomes do not predict future results.
  • Office Responsibility: Cape Fear Family Law is responsible for the content of this advertisement. Our principal office is located in Wilmington, North Carolina, with additional offices in Durham, Raleigh, and the Jacksonville/Camp Lejeune corridor.

Select your North Carolina County

Select the North Carolina County that your case will be filed in to see which of our attorneys practice within your county. Then choose a lawyer form the list to read more about each attorney.

Waneta Ellis
Known for her fierce determination, Waneta Ellis isn’t one to back down from a challenge. Serving clients in Pender and New Hanover counties, Waneta approaches high-stakes cases with a powerful mix of grit and grace. She takes pride in representing clients who need a strong advocate, particularly when navigating complex and high-profile cases. With a strategic mindset and a genuine drive to help, Waneta’s clients feel supported and prepared as she fights for their best outcomes. For Waneta, the hard work is rewarding, and seeing her clients succeed makes it all worth it.

Latest Blog Posts

How to Legally Change Your Name in NC After Divorce (2026)

The $10 Form Most People Never Hear About — and the One Case Where You Actually Need a Lawyer

Alimony Negotiation in NC

Step-Downs, Lump Sums, Tradeoffs, and What Actually Settles

Financially Dependent Spouse in NC

How to Get Temporary Support, Housing, and Counsel Before Final Orders

Enforcement and Arrears in NC

What Actually Happens When Your Ex Stops Paying Child Support?

Does 50/50 Custody Eliminate Child Support in NC?

(Spoiler: No — Here’s the Math)

Move-Away Custody in North Carolina

Why You Ask Permission, Not Forgiveness

Our Core Values

Knowledgeable

Knowledgeable

We know what to do and we actively share our knowledge.

Integrity

Integrity

Honesty in action and a good moral compass.

Empathetic

Empathetic

Active understanding without judgment.

Accountable

Accountable

To yourself, your clients, your colleagues and the court.